This documentation page refers to a previous release of DIALS (1.14).
Click here to go to the corresponding page for the latest version of DIALS

Conventions

Coordinate frames

The diffractometer equation

We use the vector \(\vec{h}\) to describe a position in fractional reciprocal space in terms of the reciprocal lattice basis vectors \(\vec{a^*}, \vec{b^*}\) and \(\vec{c^*}\).

(1)\[\begin{split}\vec{h} = \begin{pmatrix} h \\ k \\ l \\ \end{pmatrix} = h \vec{a^*} + k \vec{b^*} + l \vec{c^*}\end{split}\]

The special positions at which h, k and l are integer define the reciprocal lattice points for which (hkl) are the Miller indices.

The basic diffractometer equation relates a position \(\vec{h}\) to a position \(\vec{r_\phi}\) in Cartesian reciprocal space. This space is defined so that its axes coincide with the axes of the laboratory frame. The distinction is necessary because distances in reciprocal space are measured in units of \(\unicode{x212B}^{-1}\). However, for convenience it is often acceptable to refer to either Cartesian reciprocal space or the real space laboratory frame as the “lab frame”, when the correct choice is clear by context. The diffractometer equation is

(2)\[\vec{r_\phi} = \mathbf{R} \mathbf{A} \vec{h}\]

where \(\mathbf{R}\) is the goniostat rotation matrix and \(\mathbf{A}\) is the crystal setting matrix, while its inverse \(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\) is referred to as the indexing matrix. The product \(\mathbf{A} \vec{h}\) may be written as \(\vec{r_0}\), which is a position in the \(\phi\)-axis frame, a Cartesian frame that coincides with the laboratory frame at a rotation angle of \(\phi=0\). This makes clear that the setting matrix does not change during the course of a rotation experiment (notwithstanding small “misset” rotations — see Orientation matrix.

For an experiment performed using the rotation method we use here \(\phi\) to refer to the angle about the actual axis of rotation, even when this is effected by a differently labelled axis on the sample positioning equipment (such as an \(\omega\) axis of a multi-axis goniometer). Only in code specifically dealing with sample positioning equipment might we need to redefine the labels of axes. Outside of such modules, the rotation angle is \(\phi\) and the axis of rotation is \(\vec{e}\), which together with the definition of the laboratory frame determine the rotation matrix \(\mathbf{R}\).

Orthogonalisation convention

Following [2] we may decompose the setting matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) into the product of two matrices, conventionally labelled \(\mathbf{U}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\). We name \(\mathbf{U}\) the orientation matrix and \(\mathbf{B}\) the reciprocal space orthogonalisation matrix. These names are in common, but not universal use. In particular, some texts (for example [6] refer to the product (i.e. our setting matrix) as the “orientation matrix”.

Of these two matrices, \(\mathbf{U}\) is a pure rotation matrix and is dependent on the definition of the lab frame, whilst \(\mathbf{B}\) is not dependent on this definition. \(\mathbf{B}\) does depend however on a choice of orthogonalisation convention, which relates \(\vec{h}\) to a position in the crystal-fixed Cartesian system. The basis vectors of this orthogonal Cartesian frame are fixed to the reciprocal lattice via this convention.

There are infinitely many ways that \(\mathbf{A}\) may be decomposed into a pair \(\mathbf{U} \mathbf{B}\). The symbolic expression of \(\mathbf{B}\) is simplified when the crystal-fixed Cartesian system is chosen to be aligned with crystal real or reciprocal space axes. For example, [2] use a frame in which the basis vector \(\vec{i}\) is parallel to reciprocal lattice vector \(\vec{a^*}\), while \(\vec{j}\) is chosen to lie in the plane of \(\vec{a^*}\) and \(\vec{b^*}\). Unfortunately, this convention is then disconnected from the standard real space orthogonalisation convention, usually called the PDB convention [7]. This standard is essentially universal in crystallographic software for the transformation of fractional crystallographic coordinates to positions in orthogonal space, with units of \(\unicode{x212B}\). In particular, it is the convention used in the cctbx [4]. The convention states that the orthogonal coordinate \(x\) is determined from a fractional coordinate \(u\) by

(3)\[\vec{x} = \mathbf{O} \vec{u}\]

where the matrix \(O\) is the real space orthogonalisation matrix. This matrix transforms to a crystal-fixed Cartesian frame that is defined such that its basis vector \(\vec{i}\) is parallel to the real space lattice vector \(\vec{a}\), while \(\vec{j}\) lies in the \((\vec{a}, \vec{b})\) plane. The elements of this matrix made explicit in a compact form are

(4)\[\begin{split}\mathbf{O} = \begin{pmatrix} a & b\cos{\gamma} & c\cos{\beta} \\ 0 & b\sin{\gamma} & -c\sin{\beta}\cos{\alpha^*} \\ 0 & 0 & c\sin{\beta}\sin{\alpha^*} \\ \end{pmatrix}\end{split}\]

It is desirable to specify our reciprocal space orthogonalisation convention in terms of this real space orthogonalisation convention. [3] derives relationships between real and reciprocal space. Of particular interest from that text we have

\begin{eqnarray} \vec{x} & = & \mathbf{M}^\mathsf{T} \vec{x}^\prime \nonumber \\ \vec{x^*} & = & \mathbf{M}^{-1} \vec{x^*}^\prime \end{eqnarray}

By analogy, equate \(\vec{x^*}^\prime\) with \(\vec{h}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) with \(\mathbf{M}^{-1}\). Also equate \(\mathbf{M}^\mathsf{T}\) with \(\mathbf{O}\) and \(\vec{x}^\prime\) with \(\vec{u}\). We then see that

(6)\[\mathbf{B} = \left( \mathbf{O}^{-1} \right)^\mathsf{T} = \mathbf{F}^\mathsf{T}\]

where \(\mathbf{F}\) is designated the real space fractionalisation matrix. This is easily obtained in cctbx by a method of a cctbx.uctbx.unit_cell object.

A symbolic expression for \(\mathbf{F}\) in terms of the real space unit cell parameters is given by [8] from which we derive \(\mathbf{B}\) simply:

(7)\[\begin{split}\mathbf{B} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{a} & 0 & 0 \\ -\frac{\cos{\gamma}}{a\sin{\gamma}} & \frac{1}{b\sin{\gamma}} & 0 \\ \frac{bc}{V}\left( \frac{\cos{\gamma} \left( \cos{\alpha} - \cos{\beta}\cos{\gamma} \right)}{\sin{\gamma}} - \cos{\beta}\sin{\gamma} \right) & -\frac{ac \left( \cos{\alpha} - \cos{\beta}\cos{\gamma} \right)}{V\sin{\gamma}} & \frac{ab\sin{\gamma}}{V} \\ \end{pmatrix}\end{split}\]

with \(V = abc \sqrt{ 1 - \cos^2{\alpha} - \cos^2{\beta} - \cos^2{\gamma} + 2 \cos{\alpha}\cos{\beta}\cos{\gamma}}\)

Orientation matrix

The matrix \(\mathbf{U}\) “corrects” for the orthogonalisation convention implicit in the choice of \(\mathbf{B}\). As the crystal-fixed Cartesian system and the \(\phi\)-axis frame are both orthonormal, Cartesian frames with the same scale, it is clear that \(\mathbf{U}\) must be a pure rotation matrix. Its elements are clearly dependent on the mutual orientation of these frames.

It is usual to think of the orientation as a fixed property of the “sweep”. In practice the orientation is parameterised such that it becomes a function of time, to account for crystal slippage (the true degree of this is unknown but expected to be small; Mosflm uses crystal orientation parameters to account for inadequacies in other aspects of the experimental description). To reconcile these points, the current orientation may be expanded into a fixed, datum part and a variable time-dependent part that is parameterised. That gives

\[\vec{r_\phi} = \mathbf{\Psi}\mathbf{R}\mathbf{U_0}\mathbf{B}\vec{h}\]

where \(\Psi\) is the combined rotation matrix for the misset expressed as three angles, \(\psi_x, \psi_y\) and \(\psi_z\) in the laboratory frame.

In Mosflm these angles are converted to their equivalents in the \(\phi-\) axis frame, where:

\[\vec{r_\phi} = \mathbf{R}\mathbf{\Phi}\mathbf{U_0}\mathbf{B}\vec{h}\]

At this stage it is unclear which set of angles are the best choice for parameterisation of the crystal orientation.

The laboratory frame

An important design goal of the DIALS project is that all algorithms should be fully vectorial. By this we mean that it should be possible to change the reference frame arbitrarily and all calculations should work appropriately in the new frame.

Nevertheless, it is useful to adopt a particular standard frame of reference for meaningful comparison of results, communication between components of the software and for an agreed definition of what the laboratory consists of (incompatible definitions can be reasonably argued for, such as that it should be either fixed to the detector, or to the rotation axis and beam).

In the interests of standardisation, we choose to adopt the Image CIF (imgCIF) reference frame [1], [5].

Summary of coordinate frames

• \(\vec{h}\) gives a position in fractional reciprocal space, fixed to the crystal.
• \(\mathbf{B}\vec{h}\) gives that position in the crystal-fixed Cartesian system (basis aligned to crystal axes by the orthogonalization convention)
• \(\mathbf{UB}\vec{h}\) gives the \(\phi\)-axis frame (rotates with the crystal, axes aligned to lab frame at \(\phi=0\))
• \(\mathbf{RUB}\vec{h}\) gives Cartesian reciprocal space (fixed wrt the laboratory)
• The diffraction geometry relates this to the direction of the scattering vector \(\vec{s}\) in the laboratory frame
• Projection along \(\vec{s}\) impacts an abstract sensor frame giving a 2D position of the reflection position on a sensor.
• This position is converted to the pixel position for the 2D position on an image in number of pixels (starting 0,0 at the origin).

References

[1]	Bernstein, H. J. in Int. Tables Crystallogr. 199–205 (IUCr, 2006).

[2]	(1, 2) Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. Angle calculations for 3- and 4-circle X-ray and neutron diffractometers. Acta Crystallogr. 22, 457–464 (1967).

[3]	Giacovazzo, C. Fundamentals of Crystallography. (Oxofrd University Press, USA, 2002).

[4]	Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Sauter, N. K., Moriarty, N. W. & Adams, P. D. The Computational Crystallography Toolbox: crystallographic algorithms in a reusable software framework. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 35, 126–136 (2002).

[5]	Hammersley, A. P., Bernstein, H. J. & Westbrook, D. in Int. Tables Crystallogr. 444–458 (IUCr, 2006).

[6]	Paciorek, W. A., Meyer, M. & Chapuis, G. On the geometry of a modern imaging diffractometer. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 55, 543–557 (1999).

[7]	PDB. Atomic Coordinate and Bibliographic Entry Format Description. Brookhaven Natl. Lab. (1992).

[8]	Rupp, B. Coordinate system transformation.